Cody A. Ray

Longer holds, bigger gains

September 24, 2026

This is the fifth issue of my monthly newsletter, originally sent to subscribers on September 24, 2026.

Sunset dinner with friends and my daughter on a rooftop terrace overlooking the Costa Rican coastView over palm trees and resort pools to a bay with sailboats and forested islands in Costa RicaTwo pilots in the cockpit of a small propeller plane on the runway, seen from the seat behind themSelfie of my wife, our daughter and me toasting marshmallows outdoors

Long-term holds

One of the challenges in investing is short hold periods.

“But I want my money back ASAP!”, I hear you saying. “It’s all about the time value of money” and you can “increase the velocity of money” by getting your capital back and reinvesting it repeatedly.

It’s understandable that most investors want their money back quickly, especially for opaque growth investments whose valuations are questionable until realized at a sell in the distant future. This is one reason I prefer investments with distributions: cash flow diligence and at least a modicum return (of capital) earlier in the lifecycle.

Almost every investment sponsor across real estate (RE), private equity (PE), and venture capital (VC) underwrites for 10 year terms or less. Nowadays 6-7 years for PE and 5-10 years for RE and VC are typical. These are far too short with a multi-decade investment horizon.

This makes sense if you think about “value add” investing. Buy an underperforming asset, improve it, and flip it … especially to a retail investor or strategic (i.e., less cost-sensitive) buyer. And it’s true that your IRR is massively improved by quick returns of capital.

However, it’s also true that most of the money is made in the last decade of an investment. Taxes, transaction costs, cash drag between investments (aka reinvestment risk), and more all serve to reduce the overall returns realized with this strategy. If you only hold for a decade (or less!) you’re missing out on the long-term effects of compounding.

Compounding concentrates value in the final decade: a $1M investment compounding at 15% reaches $8.14M after 15 years, then grows to $32.92M by year 25

I recently read On The Nature Of Long-Term Holds published by Yale School of Management, which reinforced this long-held belief. This Yale case argues that entrepreneurs should stop treating a five-year exit as the natural goal for owning a business. The core claim is simple: if you’re fortunate enough to own a durable company producing attractive returns, selling it may destroy more future wealth than it realizes.

The authors highlighted one aspect that I failed to fully appreciate: the risk of trading a business you understand deeply for one with new and unfamiliar risks. You can reduce risk in businesses capable of programmatic acquisition, such as single-franchise system rollups or applying the same real estate model in the same geo repeatedly. But acquiring an operating company — in a new (even related) industry, with its unique business model, customer base, geography, or any number of different factors — dramatically increases the risk, even for a skilled and experienced operator. Put simply, knowledge compounds within a business and rapidly decays outside the circle of competence.

Even putting this aside, the paper’s math makes the point obvious. An owner holding a business compounding at 15% for 25 years finishes with $23 million after taxes and fees. Another earns the same 15% while invested but sells every five years, pays taxes and fees, and spends a year between ventures. He finishes with only $8.4 million. Even an owner earning a steady 12%, or with returns declining from 15% to 7%, ends with more wealth than the “serial entrepreneur”.

Every long-term holder beats the serial entrepreneur: holding at 15%, at a steady 12%, or as returns decline all finish ahead of selling every 5 years

Long-term business compounding is a more extreme version of what I wrote about tax deferral in retirement accounts years ago:

Absent a tax-arbitrage scenario, the advantage of tax deferral is entirely due to not being taxed twice.

and

As we can see, the advantage increases with a longer the holding period, improved investment returns, and higher tax rate.

This is why almost all of my private market investments have longer hold periods. I refuse to invest with a sponsor who wants to give my money back after 5 years. Even 10 years is too short in an ideal world.

The Duration column from my private investment tracker: mostly indefinite or 10+ years, with only a couple as short as 5-10 years

This is true for retirement accounts, fueled by a single tax deferral opportunity. A long-term hold is even more critical for businesses since they receive significantly more benefits from a long compounding horizon.

P.S. if you’re interested in running your own business and want to buy one together (especially if you’re willing to relocate), let’s talk!

👨🏽‍🌾 Personal updates

Investing

Travel

Projects

Hedgie Hub admin calendar view showing weekly writing sessions and attendance

Hedgie Hub member projects page tracking words written, time, and streaks

My lifelog “Waypoints” dashboard: places lived, countries, flights and nights away from home, reconstructed from Google Timeline history

Lifelog "Where I've been" maps of the world and United States, sized by time spent

📚 What I’ve read recently

The Collapse of Parenting (audiobook) — It was uncomfortable to be told to be an authoritative parent, and even to answer the constant “why” questions with “because we said so” … which my generation heard and hated as children. But so much rings true, such as the dominance of peer connections over family connections in teens (and even younger kids) today, and the culture of disrespect rampant in public schools.

The author speaks of an internal battle being waged in parents, between being accommodating and understanding vs being firm and directive. This book gives the confidence to shift “back” toward firmness. Fewer negotiations. Less questioning and testing of parental authority. More bonding between parents and children. (No skipping family vacations as a teenager!)

In other words, it’s our job as parents to accept some extra “angst” in childhood to improve outcomes as an adult. That’s a trade I’m willing to make, even though it’ll be harder in the short run (which is the “days are long” times!)

That all said, the author proclaims to speak from data and a scientific perspective as a physician and psychologist, but the delivery feels like a “one truth” gospel.

The Strength of the Few — The sequel to The Will of the Many that I reviewed last month. The world building is getting grander, the character development more … complex. As each mystery unfolds, more appear, giving readers a nice onion to continue peeling.

That said, some of the plot lines felt heavily inspired by Brandon Sanderson (who I love! but it isn’t the same). Still, I really enjoyed it (5 ⭐) and I’m looking forward to the release of the third book.

© 2009–2026 Cody A. Ray
RSSGitHubLinkedIn